Request Proposal

At Confidence Research, we recognize that enrollment and retention are not just operational metrics—they are strategic imperatives that directly impact the success of clinical trials. 

A successful trial begins with careful foresight, supported by a commitment to excellence at every stage. However, enrollment and retention often only become priorities when problems arise. This reactive approach can lead to delays, escalating costs, and strained relationships with both sites and participants. Instead, a proactive, data-driven strategy can ensure trials stay on track, exceed expectations, and deliver transformative outcomes.

In this article, we will explore three key strategies to enhance enrollment and retention:

Enrollment and retention are the cornerstones of any successful clinical trial. Yet, despite their critical importance, these components often do not receive adequate attention until issues arise—by which time timelines are delayed, costs soar, and protocol amendments are necessary. Taking a proactive, strategic approach from the start of the study can prevent these issues, keeping trials on schedule, within budget, and fostering stronger relationships with both sites and participants.

Why Enrollment and Retention Are Industry-Wide Challenges?

The challenges associated with enrollment and retention are well-documented in industry statistics:

  • Nearly 80% of clinical trials fail to meet initial enrollment targets, and 20% of trials fail to enroll any participants at all [1].
  • Dropouts not only disrupt timelines but also lead to additional costs, averaging $19,533 per lost participant [2].
  • Trials that adopt patient-centric and data-driven approaches can reduce timelines by up to 30% [3].

These numbers reflect more than just statistics; they represent the frustrations of underperforming sites, overwhelmed patients, and disappointed sponsors. For instance, an oncology trial that faced a one-year delay due to missed enrollment targets led to a $2 million increase in the budget and forced a trial redesign [4] [5]. Similarly, a central nervous system (CNS) trial saw a 40% dropout rate when participants struggled with frequent site visits and burdensome protocol requirements. A protocol amendment midway through the study led to further delays and costs, which could have been avoided with a more patient-focused design from the outset [6].

Strategic Enrollment Planning at Study Startup

Overcoming enrollment challenges begins with early, data-informed planning. One of the first steps is to select the right sites based on a comprehensive analysis of historical performance data. Factors such as site experience in similar therapeutic areas, patient demographics, and available resources should guide site selection decisions.

For example, a global cardiovascular trial used historical site data to prioritize high-performing locations. By focusing on sites with proven success in meeting enrollment targets, the trial exceeded its goals two months ahead of schedule and reduced projected costs by $1.5 million [7].

Enhancing Retention: Prioritizing the Participant Experience

Retention is not just about solving problems that arise mid-study—it must be embedded in the trial design from the start. After all, participants are the lifeblood of any clinical study, and their needs must be anticipated and addressed to ensure long-term engagement.

There are several key retention challenges:

  • Protocol Complexity: In some trials, participants often struggle with high visit frequencies and time-intensive demands.
  • Participant Burden: Rigid schedules often conflict with participants’ daily lives, reducing their commitment to the trial.

A simple example is a diabetes trial that addressed these issues by incorporating wearable glucose monitors and telehealth consultations into the protocol. The result? A 95% retention rate and reduced participant burden, leading to improved data quality and higher participant satisfaction [8] [9]. Of course, it’s understandable that not all studies can incorporate wearable devices, but perhaps offering home visits or reducing the number of unnecessary in-person visits could be a worthwhile consideration.

In addition, retention can be significantly improved by implementing thoughtful budgeting strategies. By prioritizing the allocation of resources to support follow-up visits and providing fair and meaningful compensation for participants’ time and effort, research teams can strengthen engagement and commitment. These targeted investments not only acknowledge the value of participants’ contributions but also create a positive experience, reducing dropouts and enhancing overall retention rates.

The Long-Term Benefits of Early Planning

Investing in strategic enrollment and retention planning from the very beginning of the trial startup phase not only keeps trials on track but also reaps significant long-term rewards. By anticipating challenges and addressing them proactively, sponsors can experience:

  • Cost Savings: Trials that stay on schedule and within budget avoid costly delays and protocol amendments. By minimizing disruptions, sponsors can optimize resources and prevent unexpected expenses.
  • Reputation Building: A well-executed trial builds trust and satisfaction among both patients and site staff. This positive reputation strengthens relationships and lays the groundwork for future collaborations, making it easier to recruit and retain top-tier sites and participants in subsequent studies.
  • Regulatory Efficiency: With fewer data gaps and protocol amendments, regulatory reviews proceed more smoothly, accelerating the time it takes for new treatments to reach the market. This efficient process can lead to quicker approval and availability of potentially life-saving therapies.

For instance, a dermatology trial that met its enrollment goals six weeks ahead of schedule avoided an estimated $500,000 in additional costs. The early adoption of patient-friendly protocols played a crucial role in its success [7] [9].

Final Thoughts: A Strategic Approach to Trial Excellence

Enrollment and retention are often treated as afterthoughts, but they should be integral to every phase of a clinical trial, influencing outcomes, budgets, and timelines. While challenges can arise as trials progress, sponsors must prioritize thoughtful site selection, patient-centric trial designs, and the strategic use of technology to proactively address these issues. By taking this approach, sponsors can improve trial success and achieve better outcomes

By embracing these strategies, sponsors can achieve their immediate goals and contribute to the broader mission of advancing healthcare innovation. At Confidence Research, we believe that enrollment and retention are more than just operational challenges—they are strategic priorities that define trial success. By integrating cutting-edge technologies, patient-focused designs, and industry expertise, we drive measurable improvements in recruitment and retention outcomes.

More than just a Contract Research Organization (CRO), Confidence Research is a dedicated partner in achieving trial excellence. Together, we can redefine benchmarks for success, accelerate healthcare innovation, and deliver improved outcomes for patients worldwide. 

For inquiries or further information, please email us at [email protected] or give us a call at +1 (650) 407-1986.

References:

  1. CenterWatch. (2022). Why Clinical Trials Struggle with Enrollment.
  2. Getz, K. (2020). Quantifying the Costs of Patient Dropout in Clinical Trials. Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development.
  3. Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative. (2021). Patient-Centric Trials: A Path to Improved Outcomes.
  4. Forbes. (2023). Oncology Trials Face Unprecedented Recruitment Challenges.
  5. Journal of Clinical Oncology. (2021). The Impact of Site Selection on Oncology Enrollment Success.
  6. Applied Clinical Trials. (2020). CNS Study Dropout Rates and the Role of Protocol Complexity.
  7. PharmaTimes. (2022). Leveraging Site Data to Accelerate Cardiovascular Trials.
  8. Diabetes Care. (2021). Retention Strategies in Diabetes Clinical Trials: A Case Study.
  9. MedTech Insights. (2023). Wearable Devices Revolutionizing Clinical Trial Retention.